After all, with our ever-growing pool of , today's dating world lends itself to pickiness even without the added layer of political disagreement.
dating affiliate pro - Democrat online dating
I spoke to Billy (name has been changed) who says that although he recently ended things with a conservative woman, he doesn't let that discourage him from dating outside of his own political ideology."There's no screening and I'm not vetting people based on what party they align themselves with," he told over the phone.
He said that "a person's political position at the end of the day matters less," adding, "It's more about the reasons behind their position than any kind of label they attach themselves." That open-mindedness isn't just love speaking; it's an encouraging indicator of a political tolerance for a whole generation.
A tiff or difference over a political issue doesn't weigh heavily or affect our relationship at all," she told .
Although they don't agree on everything, Zanotti says the key is mutual respect.
"The next time you see a bumper sticker that says, 'He’s not my President,' you may want to ask the person if they met their spouse online," Pearson-Merkowitz warns.
I wouldn't reject someone out of hand for being a Republican, but I have no interest in making polite conversation over flat beers with a guy who doesn't believe gay marriage should be legal, or who thinks abortion is tantamount to murder.
made the intriguing claim that online dating is worsening America's political polarization. Match.com, OKCupid, and the like give all their lonely hearts access to a lot of demographic data—age, race, income, hometown—that can serve as a surrogate for party affiliation, and some users even slap their political views up on their profiles.
As the piece's author, Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz, writes, this "allows people to be pickier about who qualifies as 'acceptable' before they ever have the chance to meet," lessening the chances that you'll meet that guy who loves to read and shares your sense of humor, even if he voted for Romney. Sure, it starts from a reasonable premise: "The effect of mixed politics partnering is important" because "when people are exposed to divergent political viewpoints from people they spend time with, they tend to be far more tolerant of opposing views"; and this is amplified over generations because kids grow up to think—and vote—like their parents, and tolerance and extremism are heritable, too.
If I'm contributing to the polarization of American politics by declining to raise kids with such a person, too bad.